Menzies House

US States Outlaw United Nations Agenda 21

Allan asks the question, “Ask your local Council the question and see what sort of response you receive.” From experience you will likely get a blank stare because Local Agenda 21 has become “embedded” in law. It happened more than 20-years-ago and people don’t remember how or why it all happened. But, happen it did! GC.Ed@L.

 There are some who read my previous three articles on Agenda 21, “Sustainable Development” and World Government and believe that it is nothing more than an alarmist conspiracy theory that should be sniggered at because it really doesn’t exist except in the minds of fools.  Those more astute readers take the time to do some research of their own and discover that Agenda 21, the United Nations “Sustainable Development” plan, does actually exist and is much more insidious than most would imagine.

State Legislatures in the United States are far more advanced in fighting this scourge than we in Australia.  In the latest move and following the lead of Alabama, Oklahoma’s House of Representatives recently voted unanimously to introduce legislation that will protect private property rights from the United Nations and to outlaw Agenda 21 because it poses an unacceptable threat to liberty, values and sovereignty.  It has been reported that to date some 158 government authorities in various countries have outlawed Agenda 21.

Time to take Agenda 21 seriously

There has been much talk on Menzies house recently about the UN driven Agenda 21 stemming from contributor Allan Essery. The fact that AG21 has been alive since 1992 leaves most politicians and government heads from three tiers ignorant of AG21's true nature. Few if any functionaries from that era are still in employment. And so, the precepts of the agenda are embedded in history, as it were.

The following article comes from Ibbit, one of our long-time commenters who has been doing some research. Ibbit's results and conclusions are best told by her. GC.Ed.

I have known about Agenda 21 as it affects environmental issues in Australia for a long time, but hesitated to talk about it because to do so was to be accused of buying into conspiracy theories, of being a “wing nut” and such like – in short, to be ostracised or dismissed as a loony.

Thinking back, policies of various governments have done much to harm rural Australia, in fact, in some instances, almost emptying towns and districts. I remember this starting as far back as the Hawke government, and being a rural person was greatly angered by the treatment of the “bush”. The answer as to why this started would seem to lie in the aims of Agenda 21.which aims are, in my opinion, contradictory in many ways.

One aim of A21, which seems absolutely benign, is to feed the worlds’ poor. How do you do this if you attack farmers and lessen primary produce? As has been occurring for a long while now. Think of the dire problems facing beef producers with the knee jerk reaction to a TV report about abattoirs and animal cruelty. I have always been against live shipments but what was done was not the way to go about addressing the issue, which was all too easily dismissed as politics. However, one wonders just how benign this whole affair really was in the context of A21 in Australia.

What Our Government Forgot To Tell You

Allan has become somewhat of an authority on the UN Agenda 21. His extensive research has uncovered what most politicians know nothing about. As AG21 has been around for 30 years, some leaders considder it "embedded" in law. GC.Ed.

I know there are many who think that all of this Lima Agreement/Agenda 21 business is a lot of malarkey, but before closing your mind to it I suggest you consider some of the aspects that are playing right into the hands of the United Nations Global Government planning.

Agenda 21, or SD A21 as it is known, appears at first glance to be a reasonable document that aims to correct a lot of the worlds ills.  It is much more insidious than you would suspect and you must wonder why successive Australian Governments firstly signed up and why they didn’t tell the Nation and now deny that it is being implemented in Australia. 

Australia was committed to the United Nations Agenda 21 when the Keating Government signed on during the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992, along with 177 other Nations.  The Australian people were never told about it and they were never given a chance to vote on it.

Toby at the UN

During the holidays when everyone was taking it easy, Toby travelled to Manhattan on behalf of Menzies House to interview Ban Ki Moon, the Secretary General of the United Nations.

Disguised as a corrupt dictator, Toby passed totally undiscovered and was even able to fix an appointment with the Sec Gen by merely promising the appropriate person he would get her a soccer ball, personally autographed by a guy who looked like David Beckham, which she could sell for any price she liked.

The transcript of the interview follows, secretly recorded with a mike hidden among his chest full of self-awarded medals. GC.Ed.

Nice of you to see me, Mr Secretary.

A pleasure indeed your excellency. Would you like tea? The tea we have here is $650 an ounce – nearly as dear as smack.

Thank you.

And perhaps Peruvian wortleberry biscuits – they are unobtainable anywhere else on earth?

Perhaps one or two dozen. I am dieting.

Of course. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about?

GLOBAL GOVERNANCE = WORLD GOVERNMENT

Several Labor heads have mentioned Global Governance in various speeches. But just how "all inclusive" do they mean? Agenda 21 suggests far more than know or want. The matter needs investigative efforts. Allan Essery puts the ball in play.

GLOBALISATION:  A deceptive term that to the more alert minds reads as the incremental installation of the New World Order. (Fairdinkum Radio.)

 For many years the elite around the world have sung the praises of Global Governance.  For Australia it became more of a reality with the Government signing the United Nations 1975 Lima Agreement.  This was and is an instrument that was specifically designed to by-pass, in the case of Australia, the Constitution and undermine the sovereignty of our country.

Australia’s sovereignty is being eroded away and our government no longer makes decisions in the best interest of its citizens, those decisions are now made to satisfy the many and varied United Nations treaties and agreements that Australia’s Foreign Affairs Ministers have signed while supposedly representing you.  The problem is that they didn’t bother telling you about it or what it meant.

There is nothing new about Governments ignoring the Constitution to introduce something that the Australian people didn’t want.  Anna Bligh did it and  Paul Keating did it.   The difference now is that it is being done by the United Nations and its many, varied and powerful off-shoots with a view to World Government.

Tears of joy

James, an aspiring young playwright sent this as a humorous interlude for Menzies House readers. I suggest truth is stranger than fiction. Start 2013 with laughter. GC. Ed.

The Scene:  The Prime Minister's office. She is burning old parliamentary papers and other things in her waste paper basket.

Enter Christine Milne: She is angry. leaves door open. points finger at PM.

Milne: You double crosser.

PM: What are you talking about?

Milne: Kyoto  Protocol. It's cactus. You were supposed to keep it alive. We had a deal.

PM we did our best at Doha

Milne: Pull the other one. Even Greg Combet didn't go.  And he is the bloody Minister for Climate Change.

PM: His suit hadn't come back from the cleaners. And no other world leader went. And you know what a balls Rudd and you lot made of it at Copenhagen. Anyway Kyoto Protocol is not dead. It is just resting.

Milne: Listen you. I know a dead Protocol when I see one, and I saw one at Doha.

PM. No, it's resting. It now has sixty new clauses to be ratified in 2016. It's a gorgeously looking Protocol now.

UN's Ban Ki-Moon talks climate poppycock

The UN Secretary-General's behaviour has many wondering if he is suitable for the job. His latest babble about climate change has riled more than 125 climate experts who probably think he is not up to the job. They wrote him an open letter:

On November 9 this year you told the General Assembly: “Extreme weather due to climate change is the new normal … Our challenge remains, clear and urgent: to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to strengthen adaptation to … even larger climate shocks … and to reach a legally binding climate agreement by 2015 … This should be one of the main lessons of Hurricane Sandy.”

We the undersigned, qualified in climate-related matters, wish to state that current scientific knowledge does not substantiate your assertions.

Read more:www.financialpost.com

Piers Akerman puts UN seat in perspective

While foreign minister Boob Carr huffs and puffs about Australia's triumphant win of a seat on the UN Security Council, some, without the illusion through rose-coloured-glasses can see the whole picture.

Australia spent some $24 million directly and diverted hundreds of millions in foreign aid to gain the right to play in the same room with the five permanent members of the Security Council as a backward African nation with about half our population and a reputation for supporting a rebellion in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Read more: www.news.com.au